In recent years, revolutionary advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) have captivated our imagination and transformed various industries. The aerospace sector, with its constant pursuit of innovation, has also been profoundly impacted by these developments. As we delve into the applications of AI, like the infamous ChatGPT Assistant and all those related tools, we uncover a plethora of opportunities for the aviation and aerospace industry that were unimaginable just a few years ago.
The current buzz around AI, blockchain, and automation prompts us to explore how these cutting-edge technologies can be seamlessly integrated into the aerospace industry. In particular, we turn our attention to software development guidelines, specifically DO-178C, and discover one remarkable application: automated verification. We even held a webinar on the subject with over 150 Avionics pros in attendance.
How to choose the right DO-178C Verification steps
DO-178C necessitates several verification activities, ranging from verifying the developed software to ensuring compliance with the verification process itself. Traditionally, verification tasks were predominantly performed manually, but the introduction of automated tools has significantly streamlined these processes. By leveraging AI-powered tools, aviation and aerospace organizations can achieve DO-178C objectives efficiently and effectively. However, it is crucial to qualify these tools for use in accordance with the DO-330 Guidelines, especially when their output is not verified independently.
While it is technically feasible to perform all verification activities manually for DO-178C compliance, it would be an arduous and inefficient undertaking. The integration of tools, whether developed internally or sourced from external suppliers, provides a multitude of benefits. Tools automate time-consuming verification activities, resulting in substantial time savings throughout the project’s lifespan. When determining whether to adopt a tool or stick to manual processes for a specific verification activity, key factors to consider include the code base’s size and complexity, the intricacy of the verification task, and the long-term time-saving potential offered by the tool.
Developing internal tools tailored to specific DO-178C verification activities can be advantageous, as they can be precisely customized to meet unique use cases. However, it’s essential to bear in mind the high costs associated with developing and maintaining such tools. Additionally, if you rely on an internally developed tool, providing tool qualification evidence becomes necessary. This qualification can be achieved internally or by collaborating with an external company specializing in tool qualification.
Internal vs. External Development
Suppose your verification needs are not fully addressed by existing tools in the market. In that case, it may be prudent to approach multiple vendors and discuss the possibility of developing custom features to meet your requirements. Deciding whether to adopt a verification tool or not for a specific activity ultimately hinges on the project’s nuances. For relatively simple verification tasks with minimal rework expected, manual processes may suffice. Conversely, complex and time-consuming verification activities prone to rework often benefit from automated tools. It’s crucial to evaluate whether a particular tool requires qualification and to explore the availability of qualification kits for the tools under consideration.
Goal-driven Projects
The decision to utilize tools should always be driven by the goal of enhancing verification efficiency. While tools can significantly streamline certain projects, each endeavor possesses unique requirements. In some cases, such as small-scale projects, manual processes might suffice without compromising efficiency. Consequently, it is prudent to carefully assess the specific needs of your project and compare the efficiency gains of manual processes versus automation. Generally, a hybrid approach that combines both manual processes and automation represents the optimal strategy for successful Avionics software development projects, and ultimately, DO-178C verification and compliance.
Regardless of your development strategy, the aerospace industry stands at the precipice of transformation, fueled by the immense potential of advanced technologies like AI. By embracing AI-powered automation and verification tools, aviation and aerospace companies can unlock new levels of efficiency, productivity, and compliance with software development guidelines. The path to success lies in understanding the unique requirements of each project and leveraging the appropriate blend of manual and automated processes. As AI continues to evolve, the possibilities for the aviation and aerospace industry are truly limitless.
